Written By Prodigal Son on Timenolonger.ning.com
Watch The Documentary Here
As interesting as the story itself are the facts behind it. I have been doing searches on the people and topics surrounding the NOAA mermaid research and there is, without a doubt, a pretty successful campaign to obliterate all information of it from the internet.
First, there is the website of the NOAA scientist, Dr. Paul Robertson.
and the website mermaidsarealive.com “The real Evidence on Mermaids, From Dr. Paul Robertson,NOAA”
and the website believeinmermaids.com “Mermaids are Real, Real Evidence From Dr. Paul Robertson, NOAA”
You will notice a similar result clicking all those links:
The only information left on the internet concerning the research of this phenomenon is the Animal Planet special itself, a Wikipedia entry calling that program a “mockumentary” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mermaids:_The_Body_Found ) and various bloggers, youtube members or forum posters speaking on the topic. Many of those speaking on it have come to the conclusion that it is “debunked” based mostly on the claim that Dr. Paul Robertson and a marine biologist by the name of Brian McCormick do not exist.
They are hard to find, but they do exist.
Here is an excerpt from a document by the Narragansett Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, which research is affiliated with NOAA according to the document, and lists Brian McCormick as one individual who contributed to the project.
“The NBNERR Site Profile was made possiblethrough the help of many individuals. Notable contributorsand the expertise that they provided include…
Sincere thanks also goes to current and formerNBNERR staff members who assisted with materialspresented in this document, but who did not individually author any of the chapters. These individuals include Robert
Stankelis, Kristen Van Wagner, Jennifer West, MatthewRehor, Kimberly Botelho, Brian McCormick, Alan Beck,and especially Roger Greene…
This publication is sponsored by the NOAAEstuarine Reserves Division and the State of Rhode Island.This publication is also sponsored in part by Rhode Island Sea Grant under NOAA Grant No. NA040AR4170062. The views expressed herein do not necessarily refl ect the views of the NBNERR, NOAA, or any of its sub-agencies. The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute
reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon.”
http://www.nbnerr.org/Content/SiteProfile08/1_Preface.pdf
And here is an excerpt from a document on the minutes of a Devils Lake water improvement district meeting. Listed as staff:
“STAFF: Paul Robertson, Seth Lenaerts, RARE Participant”
and affiliated with NOAA:
“Seid Creek: Green asked what is expected as the outcome on this issue. Robertson said nothing has occurred. NOAA previously said they were going to do a site inspection in March. Follow-ups have gone unanswered. Robertson asked if a letter from the Board would be effective. He explained that this is a construction site that has been filling debris above wetlands. Last year, a lot of it slid down into the wetlands. DSL has turned away from any enforcement action and the Corps never investigated. Robertson said it appears that Seid Creek is a watershed similar to Thompson Creek. Green asked for Robertson to continue making calls rather than the Board writing a letter just yet.”
http://www.dlwid.org/PDFs/Minutes%202009%2011%2005.pdf
Why, among all “conspiracy” related topics would this be the one that was so highly attacked? There are certainly elements of well accepted mainstream beliefs that might be shattered with the knowledge of aquatic humanoids. The aquatic ape theory is so poorly presented that even very adamant evolutionists could not help but feel shamed to preach it and it would not suffice to halt the questions about the accepted ideas of how life came to be on Earth. That is not the answer all by itself though. There is something else that should not be lost on the viewer amidst the more sensational news of mermaids. The weaponized “sonar” which the Navy had allegedly invented is surely a serious issue if it were publicly recognized.
I am not sure that i believe this weapon is Naval or is an advanced sonar weapon. We know there are sound weapons now and we know they can be lethal. They are not just a threat to wildlife in the Oceans, they are a threat to people on land as they have the capacity to be used not just in an aquatic environment but anywhere.
The USC sections sited on the shut down sites are those pertaining to making fraudulent or fictitious claims against the government. Those so-called fictitious claims almost certainly relate to the sound weapon mentioned. They are working hard to hide this and i wonder what we can do to make it less hidden, YHWH willing.
3 comments
#1RebeccaMay 28, 2013, 7:48 am
Thank you so much for writing this. I have been wondering the same thing, why the cover up? When it relates to weapons of mass destruction, such as this sonar weapon, it completely makes sense. Anything that has the power to destroy large populations of huge mammals all at once, such as the mammals beached in the documentary, this alone would cause outrage withpeople, and animal rights and environmental groups. Then if you bring in the drilling for oil and natural gas, as the follow up to the original documentary which aired tonight did, it all makes complete sense. Government, military and buisness all have a huge investment to lose.
#2NayaMay 30, 2013, 7:45 am
My sentiments exactly, Rebecca! Why else would they be treating this like such a big deal, otherwise? Skepticism about “mythical creatures” has been around for ages with no one doing a damn thing about it. But once someone mentions a little thing about the government, then suddenly it’s a huge ordeal! I hope the sites are opened back up again soon.
#3corneliusMay 31, 2013, 3:38 am
this is apart of the cover up
Add your comment