Lawmakers within the Canadian province of Quebec have adopted a regulation banning public service employees from carrying religious symbols. Critics and advocates each see it as an try of the Francophone area to protect its identification.
Bill 21 (Loi 21) was handed by a vote of 73-35 within the National Assembly on Sunday. It bars civil servants “in positions of authority” – reminiscent of lecturers, police, and authorities legal professionals – from carrying religious symbols. This consists of Christian crucifixes, Muslim headscarves, Sikh turbans and Jewish yarmulkes, for example.
Muslim girls carrying the total face veil (burqa) will probably be immediately affected by the supply requiring individuals giving or receiving authorities providers to uncover their faces, for functions of safety or confirming identification.
Lawmakers additionally authorized Bill 9, which imposes new French language and values assessments for potential immigrants meant to “protect Quebec identity.”
“Look, we can talk semantics all day long. You know and I know what this is all about,” authorized and media analyst Lionel instructed RT, suggesting that the seemingly secular statute stood as a proxy for anti-immigrant sentiment.
“I do imagine there’s a combination of this try and protect the uniqueness of that province… and attempting to ‘dress’ a sure immigration state of affairs,” Antonio Rossini, professor on the University of Windsor in neighboring Ontario, agreed. “I doubt that this would have popped up in a different historical context.”
Rossini instructed RT that many Canadians are likely to put on religious symbols not as a present of their religion, however as a press release about their identification and origin.
In Canada, such a measure appears frankly misplaced.
Commentator Gavin McInnes identified, nonetheless, that Quebec could be very distinct from the remainder of Canada: the province has “language police” that enforces the primacy of French, and its inhabitants – primarily descendants of French colonists from the early 1600s – have “perfectly preserved their country in amber, like some prehistoric dragonfly.”
McInnes disagreed with the ban on Sikh turbans and referred to as the ban on the yarmulke “absurd,” however agreed with the ban on the burqa as one thing “just not compatible with Western culture.”
“If you keep creating this bubble, eventually you’re going to come across as a fascist,” he instructed RT. The thought of banning religious symbols seems “totally fascist and tyrannical,” however Quebec might be attempting to nip identification politics – apart from its personal – within the bud, McInnis mentioned.