“One can get the same effect with dancing and drum-beating; that’s what is called a ‘primitive’ religion. Use drugs, nowadays, and you’re a hippie. Do it with sex, and you’re a witch, or one of the Knights Templar. Mass participation in an animal sacrifice has the same effect. Human sacrifice has been used in many religions, including the Aztec cult everybody has heard about, as well as in Satanism.
Modern psychologists say that the force released is Freud’s libidinal energy. Mystics call it prajna or the Astral Light. Whatever it is, human sacrifice seems to release more of it than sex or drugs or dancing or drumbeating or any less violent method and mass human sacrifice unleashes a ton of it…”
The terms I will use should be comprehensive, but I will have to assume the correct definition and meaning is understood, including semantic discernment in case of synonymous, colloquial, historical variations etc.
I will prove that a satanic sacrifice ritual was the motive of the massacre at Connecticut, a logical argument against it would be that if there is no proof about the “satanic realm” existence, there cannot be proof about a conspiracy incriminated for its “involvement in it”, but this is faulty logic, regardless of the existence of a satanic realm, satanic rituals and brutal, cruel sacrifices are documented and proven to take place in this very dense and material realm of the world.
In other words, Christmas takes place regardless of the existence of Santaclaus. To prove that a particular gathering took place with the intention to celebrate Christmas is perfectly possible, and even easier while regarding the existence of Santaclaus as irrelevant for this case.
But this also adds weight to the already proven existence of Ley lines themselves.