Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    USAHITMAN Conspiracy News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    USAHITMAN Conspiracy News
    Home»Conspiracy or Not»UK man wins court case against BBC for 9/11 cover up
    Conspiracy or Not

    UK man wins court case against BBC for 9/11 cover up

    By mediahitmanApril 10, 2013No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    wtc7-bbcTony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

    So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

    Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.

    Source

    9/11 Against BBC Case Court Cover-Up UK Wins WTC 7
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    mediahitman

    Related Posts

    BT to charge people £50 for keeping old wi-fi routers

    January 29, 2020

    Cartoon from 2016: Predicts Death by Helicopter of Kobe

    January 28, 2020

    Meadowhall facial recognition scheme troubles watchdog

    January 28, 2020
    Leave A Reply

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.