‘No future for dissidents’ on social media: Paul Joseph Watson reflects on Facebook ban

Popular web pundit Paul Joseph Watson is mulling authorized motion after being banned from Facebook for spreading “hate,” telling RT that it’s clear social media platforms are cracking down on dissident political speech.

Facebook kicked Watson off its platform on May 2 – together with conservative commentator Laura Loomer, Infowars founder Alex Jones, and black nationalist chief Louis Farrakhan. The group was accused of spreading “hateful” content material, though no warnings or concrete causes have been supplied for their seemingly arbitrary bans.

Watson, who runs a YouTube channel that boasts greater than 1.5 million subscribers, has turn into a widely known however polarizing commentator on tradition and politics. An extended-time Infowars contributor, Watson now has his personal outlet, Summit News.

Although he’s been labeled as an “alt-right” conspiracy theorist, Watson insists that he’s been smeared – and de-platformed – just because he holds contrarian views.

“There is clearly no future for dissident personalities on any major social media network. We will have to go back to mailing lists and websites as our primary, and perhaps only platforms for delivering content,” he stated.

He informed RT that he’s employed the “best media lawyers in London” who “have taken on quite a few media giants prior to now and received” and will advise him about what authorized recourse he has in opposition to Facebook.

The first step in direction of suing Facebook over his ban, based on Watson, is to provoke a written request, known as a Subject Access Request, which requires the corporate to launch all info related to the person’s case underneath Section 7 of the Data Protection Act. 

The info could be wanted to confirm if a person violated neighborhood requirements or if the corporate merely made a politically-motivated choice. Watson additionally intends to place Facebook on discover in regards to the hurt they’ve prompted to his status by placing him underneath the class of “dangerous individuals,” which is one among Facebook’s stated causes for banning individuals underneath the corporate’s neighborhood requirements. 

The listing Facebook has made for what counts as “dangerous individuals” contains: Terrorist exercise, organized hate, mass or serial homicide, human trafficking, and arranged violence or felony exercise. Facebook must verifiably show that the banned particular person engaged in any of those actions, or the choice might depend as defamation of character.

Read More Here